Emerson’s definition of “Self-Reliance” consists of complete individuality. Emerson promotes an individual who would be a non-conformist who does not patronize institutions, who "pinches the dime." He writes, “Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members…the virtue in most request is conformity. Self reliance is its aversion.” This assertion states that society is stealing individualism, and it is enforced through conformity. Because of this, one should adhere to his or her ideals before any other outside influence, which stems from society and its’ concomitant, institutions.
Thoreau puts these ideas into action in “Civil Disobedience.” First of all, her promotes the individual over society. He went to jail because he refused to pay taxes that supported the Mexican-American war and slavery, both of which he severely disagreed with. In this instance, Thoreau put his beliefs above “duty” to the government, a societal institution. After his night in jail, Thoreau comes to realize that everyone else is conforming. They will protest something so long as the effects, such as jail time, do not affect their property or position in society. These people are embarrassed not to conform, and therefore society holds power over them. But not Thoreau. Thoreau is Emerson’s writing come to life. He is the quintessential non-conformist who is willing to go to any extent to pacify his beliefs and criticize those who do not.
could you do more than simply give a synopsis of your ideas. Try posting a picture and possibly another example in our times when Emerson or Thoreau would advocate Civil Disobedience.
ReplyDelete